Hi @HarryLegg, it’s a good question. We rely on publisher assertions to establish relationships between digital objects in their metadata, which isn’t something that can be done via a crawler. Of course it would be lovely if all DOIs were fully interoperable across RAs but absent that interoperability our mandate is only to understand the relationships between objects for which Crossref DOIs have been registered. This post from our former director of technology and research has some further thoughts about cross-RA interoperability and the larger project of DOIs as a whole, if you’re interested.
I am new here, and I was wondering why some of my article’s citations are not showing up on the Taylor & Francis page. I realized I am having slightly the same problems.
My article: DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2024.2342113
On Scopus, it shows that 5 other articles are citing this article. I went to check, and I noticed that in one of the citations, the author wrote the title with a Z instead of an S, so that may be the case. However, I don’t understand why the other citations are not showing up. Is there any way of solving this?
In order for us to make a cited-by connection between your DOI and the DOI citing your work, we must have reference metadata registered with us, like this example for DOI 10.1111/cobi.14349. As you can see, Wiley (prefix 10.1111) has registered references with Crossref and your DOI was included in that reference list. Thus, we established a cited-by connection between your DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2024.2342113 and DOI 10.1111/cobi.14349.
I can’t speak to the fifth work that we’re not making a cited-by connection to, but we’re only matching DOIs registered with us which have references included in the metadata.
